Industrial animal farming is increasingly damaging the climate and biodiversity, according to the ‘Meat Atlas’ just released by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung and Friends of the Earth Europe.
The livestock industry is responsible for up to 21% of global greenhouse-gas emissions/ This figure is likely to escalate if the global meat and dairy consumption trends continue.
The Meat Atlas 2021 exposes that:
- Meat production is estimated to increase by 40 million tonnes by 2029, reaching 366 million tonnes of meat per year. To keep up with this, industrial animal farming is on the rise and keeps pushing sustainable models out of the market.
- Globally, three quarters of agricultural land is used to raise animals or the crops to feed them. Livestock farming and soybean cultivation are the biggest contributors to deforestation, whose effects include soaring emissions, destruction of indigenous communities’ and small farmers’ livelihoods, and pandemics.
- The food sector accounts for between 21% and 37% of global greenhouse-gas emissions. Emissions from industrial animal farming account for around 57% of this.
- Taken together, 20 livestock firms are responsible for more greenhouse-gas emissions than Germany, Britain or France. The six of them that are headquartered in the European Union have not disclosed the total emissions from their supply chains.
- Agribusiness corporations dominate the market. They operate giant slaughterhouses with often poor working conditions that sparked several COVID-19 mass outbreaks.
- Between 2015 and 2020, global meat and dairy companies received over 478 billion US dollars in backing from 2,500 investment firms, banks, and pension funds, most of them based in North America or Europe.
Stanka Becheva, Food and Agriculture Campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe said: “Industrial meat farming is fanning the flames of climate crisis and biodiversity collapse while threatening the health of farmers, workers and consumers – the evidence is resounding.”
“The EU needs to curb this insatiable industry, but right now its leaders are just eating out of Big Agribusiness’ hand. Europe must act to clamp down on deforestation and human rights violations in supply chains, facilitate the switch to more plant-based diets, and redirect billions of euros of subsidies and finance to small sustainable farmers.”
Barbara Unmüßig, President of the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung said: “Despite a lot of good-will-talk between industry and policy makers at all levels, a turnaround in meat production has not yet been initiated. The economic interests of the meat industry, which is worth billions, and the refusal of politicians to reform strategically and coherently are keeping us on a tortuous path overstretching the ecological limits of the planet. The way things are, we will need to reduce meat production by half.”
“As the polls in this Meat Atlas 2021 show, the younger generations in Germany -but also in other countries- share this critical assessment: they no longer accept the meat industry’s business model. More than 70 percent of German young adults are willing to pay more for meat if the production conditions change fundamentally. But the most decisive result: a huge majority of over 80 percent see politics in the duty to finally set binding conditions for a climate friendly agriculture, better animal husbandry and a climate-friendly diet.”
Friends of the Earth Europe and Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung demand more effective support for sustainable small-scale livestock producers and decentralised meat processing facilities that contribute to rural development. They say a transition fund for workers in the meat industry to shift into more sustainable jobs is indispensable.
The organisations push for strong human rights due diligence legislation. A proposal for a new European law is expected from the European Commission this autumn. Laws should force companies, including financiers, to identify risks of harms in their global value chains and to prevent, mitigate and remedy those harms.
Another immediate action they demand is to stop all subsidies the CAP provides to industrial animal farming. Instead, greater support should be given to fairer, more climate- and nature-friendly farming.
